
My best clients pay on time. In fact, many of them pay early. It’s the kind of reciprocation that not only makes me smile, but makes me feel like my work is valued and enough to ensure that, when it comes to billing and perks, I will do my best to give these clients the same back in kind. I suppose you could call it the Golden Rule but, to me, it’s just the fair and honest way to run a business. These clients are important enough to me that I will go the extra mile to let them know it. In short, I’ve moved my schedule around to accommodate their needs, I offer complimentary discounts, I’m much more flexible when it comes time to negotiate additional terms, I think of them first when it comes time to mail out care packages (from my garden every year, eh?), and I definitely –most definitely –let each accounting department and their bosses know how much I value their attention to deadlines.
It’s a pleasure to work with people that understand the importance of making timely payments (especially since, as photographers, we understand the importance of submitting our work to meet publication deadlines). At a very basic level, regular and timely payments ensure that your business is able to return the favor to its creditors in the same, timely manner (and, in doing so, also avoids interest and finance charges related to late payments). This cycle is part of what is called ‘cashflow,’ or the cycle of cash in and out of a business. Without diving too deep into this subject, a healthy business should have enough cash flowing into the business each month to, at bare minimum, cover its periodic expenses. For example, if you have $100 in expenses each month, you need to bring in $100 to cover that debt. Reductive? Yes. Obvious? Yes. (So, CPAs, don’t get your panties all bunched up because we’re not talking about the finer, nuanced points of corporate finance).
In the same example, if your business brings in less than its monthly expenses, you will end up paying finance charges and late fees for the overdue payment or you will borrow money from a line of credit in order to make the payment. In either instance, poor cashflow management costs you money and requires you to remain vigilant on your accounts receivable so that this situation doesn’t recur to the point that you can no longer remain solvent.
Complicating this cycle are changes in expenditures. Certain things remain relatively fixed –utilities, rent, professional services, etc. – while others fluctuate. A camera breakdown? Car explodes? Or, more appropriate to the example, a client hires you for a shoot that requires expenses related to the shoot’s undertaking. Gas, hotel, meals, models, equipment rentals, additional staff, makeup, props, etc. You will incur these expenses on behalf of your client and you will (hopefully) bill a reasonable amount with a reasonable deadline for payment so that you, in turn, can pay off the creditors who helped you make those purchases (even if that creditor is your own savings account).
In order to handle these expenses, I bill on a NET 30 basis. NET 30 means that my client is responsible for paying their debt in full no more than 30 days from when my services are rendered in full. The reason that I elect this billing cycle is simple: my creditors operate on the same cycle. So that I can pay them on time, my business requires a regular influx of cash on the same cycle in order to cover those expenses. This is particularly important in instances where the execution of a client’s job requires additional expenses above and beyond my fixed overhead. In short, keeping to this cycle –and explaining its importance to reluctant clients –helps my business remain solvent and steer clear from the trappings of becoming a bank for my clients.
For a listing of several other standard payment terms, visit this page. Choosing the right payment terms for your business is integral to keeping it open for the long-haul.
***
Matt Slaby is a Colorado-based attorney (and photographer). Matt attended the University of Denver College of Law on a full public interest scholarship. His experiences in law school include a PILG clerkship for ongoing civil work with El Centro Humanitario’s legal clinic as well as handling wage claims and contract issues for DU’s Civil Litigation Clinic. He is a founding member of Luceo and, in addition to his photography, brings his legal background to the organization. Questions, comments, and ideas for future posts are welcome. Please add them to the comments section or reach me here: mattslaby@luceoimages.com
**DISCLAIMER: Luceo Images LLC and Matt Slaby assume no liability for the information provided above. This information may not be correct when applied to your specific situation. Moreover, the information provided is not intended to create an attorney/client relationship and shall not be construed as legal advice.




Matt Nager
August 23rd, 2010, 8:42 pm #
I think most of us (again, hopefully) bill clients with a due date for payment no later than 30 days. Care to go into how you handle clients who a) don’t make payments on time or b) tell you they won’t have payment in the time frame you present?
I would also be interested in hearing more about your courtship practices with billing and accounting offices.
*Forgive me if you covered this in a past post…I have been out of the country for some time.
Oh, and your link doesn’t work.
Matt Slaby
August 23rd, 2010, 9:21 pm #
Hi Matt,
Hey Matt,
First, the link is fixed. Thanks for passing on the heads-up. Second, I’ve been a little bit shocked in several conversations lately to find that many photographers either didn’t understand what this payment term meant and/or didn’t care to keep their clients true to paying within that timeframe. For those of us that want to be in business in 20 years, it’s difficult to hear folks disregard the importance of receiving timely payment. Personally, I think the biggest hurdle is not wanting to offend the client by asking that they treat you and your business with the same respect that you treat their deadlines and timeframes for submitting your photos. It’s a matter of self-respect and I think that there’s a distinct risk to allowing something so integral to your own financial solvency to be cast aside because a photographer is afraid of offending the client. To me, it sends the wrong message on several different levels. That said, I also believe that there is a tactful way to approach this subject and I wouldn’t, by any stretch of the imagination, advocate for approaching this issue without a little sensitivity.
A good portion of your questions are addressed in a set of older posts. Each URL is copied below.
http://luceoimages.com/2010/05/legal-left-meet-creative-right-collections-pt-1/
http://luceoimages.com/2010/05/legal-left-meet-creative-right-collections-pt-2/
http://luceoimages.com/2010/05/legal-left-meet-creative-right-collections-pt-3/
Hope that helps. Drop me a follow-up note it it doesn’t.
-MS
Peter Hoffman
August 26th, 2010, 1:36 am #
Matt,
I agree with your philosophy here and it makes complete sense. Question though – ever come in to contracts with 45 day payment periods, or 30 day after published periods (which can mean like, 90-120 days till you actually get the check) etc, things of that nature? Do you just try to change those clauses?
There have been those few times where once I request a more limited usage, a better fee or whatever it may be that arguing another point almost feels (possibly) unnecessarily contentious. But then again I am still learning about the best ways to do this sort of thing. Maybe you’re lucky enough to not have had to deal with that.
Matt Slaby
August 27th, 2010, 8:52 pm #
Hey Peter,
The financial side of this question has a lot in common with how we make images. Our perception changes according to where we put the outer brackets. For example, if you do a job for $5000 and $1000 of that total covers your expenses, receiving one check on a Net 45 or 60 basis isn’t necessarily that big of a deal.
But if you do this same job for the same client four times a year, the number becomes more significant. Multiply that by a ten or twenty year career, and it can be downright hefty. This really becomes a time value of money question. Over twenty years, assuming no significant changes, you lose out on substantial opportunity. Without considering extraneous factors, that’s $80,000 over the course of 80 months that could have paid off debts or otherwise been invested. In essence, it’s a significant lost opportunity.
Credit periods in excess of 30 days make more sense to me when your relationship with the client is consistent and your cashflow won’t be interrupted after a preliminary period. The classic example of this is a hamburger stand paying its hamburger supplier on a Net 60 basis. The vendor sells to the client on a relatively fixed and regular basis such that, even though January’s bill won’t come due until March, money will still be coming in in February. The risk that the vendor takes on the initial period is offset by their receipt of regular checks.
In publishing, this kind of arrangement is a virtual myth. There are very few companies guaranteeing regular work on a monthly basis.
To me, the solution is not necessarily to draw an immovable line in the sand and demand Net 30 or nothing. Rather, it’s important to understand the bigger picture of why prompt payments under reasonable terms are important. And, more importantly, when a client cannot (or will not) accommodate these terms, it’s also important to consider the other pieces of the deal that you can negotiate in order to receive compensation for your risk. See, for example, this old post: http://luceoimages.com/2010/01/legal-left-meet-creative-right-beyond-price/
-MS